Mr Reece -
Gambling? This security has gone from fifty cents to one seventy in the span of a few weeks, while the naysayers have done their best to keep it down. What are you going to tell me? That the only way for this to go south if illegal actions are undertaken. That is what the portrait you paint entails. You join the rest of the naysayers who have tried to create a plausible reason why this security has risen, and now the theme you promote is that insider securityholders will end the short selling squeeze, so at least you admit there will be a squeeze, or did you not realize what you were truly saying? I would like one non-sidney sheldon, non-conspiracy, non-insinuation scenario of why it will not happen. I did welcome the naysayers, read my early posts were I asked for reasons this would not happen, and all I received were maker of market and insider holders conspiracy schemes. You I do not like for your past involvements in underhanded use of these note arenas, then you preach morality. What is next? Fidelity lectures from bill clinton? I have not had much of a problem with anyone else other then those who attacked me{see jhild's attacks}, note how I responded to ms shell's panic over the quotation system utilized in this forum and it's inherent update problem. No emotion, yet a simple alternative to her thoughts. You are offensive. Not your ideas, but your character and nature, that is why I responded to you. Your ideas revolve around illegal acts, and I think you have created a scenario that would most certainly constitute fraud by aznt management to take actions contrary to statements made in press releases. So should I trust them or you not to commit illegal acts? Not a very tough choice for me to make. Bests,
KC |
