Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: cool who wrote (5581)	9/13/1998 10:28:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (1) of 13994

dc, when a person is on trial for sexual crimes, the right to privacy is limited. In the President's case vs. PJ, it was limited in three different ways. Read the Starr report, and read the words of Judge Susan Webber Wright. It's not like the President was asked out of the blue sky about his sex life -- it was a carefully reasoned decision by a Federal Judge -- who decided that the right of Paula Jones to due process in pursuing her claim outweighed Bill Clinton's possible embarrassment. Let me ask you and anyone else: Knowing now the facts of the relationship between WJC and ML, do you think that the PJ trial may have been allowed to proceed, at least to go to trial? In most of the sexual incidents between WJC and ML, they began by the President abruptly "exposing himself" for her to service. That is precisely what PJ accused him of doing to her. Think about it. PJ was certainly defrauded of her right to a jury trial of her peers. WJC personally brought that about by perjuring himself again and again in his deposition. Shame.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next