dc, okay, I'm going to have to get blunt here.
re >Paula Jones never established that she suffered any damage at the workplace--that should have been proven first---.....any decent judge
would have first require Jones to prove harm. Did she lose her job, not receive promotion---<
First off, someone has already posted on one of these Clinton threads the decision since PJ case was thrown out where a Federal Court has ruled that the sexually harassed person does NOT have to prove that they were denied raises, promotions, etc, in order to make a claim of sexual harassment. This is only common sense---there are *limits* to what a person should be subjected to, both in public and in the workplace.
Now: If you sincerely believe that it is not some form of sexual harassment, sexual offense, etc, to be exposed to someone's private part: the next time you are on a train, for instance, or an airplane, how would you like it if the man seated next to your wife unzipped his pants and exposed his erect penis to your wife?
Get a clue, guy. You're ridiculous. Yes, Susan was to be obeyed when she directed Bill Clinton to obey the court and answer truthfully. We could debate all day the merits of that decision, but it was her decision! Was PJ allowed to continue her case in the court of Susan W-W?? No, because Susan threw it out. That was also her decision, and PJ and everyone else was obligated to abide by that decision: They Had to Obey that Decision, until another court reverses or otherwise overrides that decision.
Bill on the other hand, took matters in his own hands, so to speak, and chose to willfully flout the law, to defraud the Court of its decision to have him testify fully and truthfully about the matter at hand. In doing so Bill defrauded PJ of legal due process. Again I say shame be upon Bill, and the man is lower than pond scum. |
