SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 99.85+6.2%Nov 24 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Little Joe who wrote (18714)9/13/1998 11:57:00 PM
From: Enigma  Read Replies (2) of 116764
 
LJ:

1. Would he have - probably - almost certainly.
2 Don't know - but if he'd found a hustler like Monica (who would have showed him her thong underwear!), probably - who knows.
3.He has Monica's word - I only have what I have read - which is the truth - who knows?.

Monica has not been subjected to cross examination, nor have any of the other witnesses. Monica made a deal to avoid a perjury charge - is she still lying - probably not but maybe in part. An admitted liar made a deal to save her skin, how much is the truth? These questions have to be asked, because we have seen an orchestrated
prosecution in which everything is from the one side. Evidence helpful to the President was not helpful (obviously) to Starr and therefore was discarded. So far Starr has 'proved' nothing.

I guess this is verbotten? E
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext