Visibility -
I disagree with you. Do you consider what mr reece states as facts believable? I do not. He claims that insider security holders can enter millions of issues into the public float legally after stating they wish to have investors call their certificates. He is wrong, and his message is flawed in the way he is, there is no believable substance. As for him changing his ways, I suggest you read my exchange with him. How many times did he INVENT phrases and attribute them to me? How many times has he drawn inferences into other's words that were CLEARLY not there, to support his unfounded illicit scenarios? Too many times for me to believe that he has changed since he lied in may. Do you think that someone who has lied as recently as may, and only became honest after he was caught, is a credible source of information? How can he be? His posts here are not aboveboard or he would not need to change what others say so he can twist it to an attack and indictment of this company where none could reasonably be done, at least not on the issues he has raised. He has proposed several scenarios all predicated on the basis of aznt management committing illegal, immoral acts. I guess he is applying the ron reece philosophy of deceptive investing to others.
If he is now an honest man, why did he try and attribute and associate the phrases he probably used to dupe grno investors to me, when I had clearly said nothing even remotely similiar? You seem to be buying his lines now, ask grno investors who bought his line a few months ago, how they feel about his honesty and the honesty of his message. Bests,
KC |
