SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (20978)9/15/1998 12:06:00 PM
From: Bearded One  Read Replies (2) of 24154
 
I'm interested in this paragraph

Microsoft allegedly set out to eliminate the threats posed by Java and Netscape. Plaintiffs contend that Mr. Gates led the charge to "wrest control of Java away from Sun," SJ Opp'n Ex. 60, and to convert Java to what Microsoft called a "polluted" version which would effectively limit applications to those which would run on Microsoft's systems. To
accomplish this goal, Microsoft allegedly entered into a series of anticompetitive agreements with customers and competitors to restrict the use of Java and to substitute the use of Microsoft's version of Java, known as "J/Direct." See, e.g., T. Nielsen 8/25/97 e-mail to B. Gates ("[W]e are just proactively trying to put obstacles in Sun's path and get anyone that wants to write in java to use J/Direct.") (SJ Opp'n Ex. 62).


Question: We've heard all about Microsofts alleged anticompetitive agreements against Netscape. But I've not heard of anticompetitive agreements against Java. This is new to me. Anyone else know anything about this?

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext