SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Kensington Resources Ltd. (V.KRT) * Diamond in the rough!
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: joe minten who wrote (2693)9/15/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) of 5206
 
OK explain the 152 stones reference to me.
I'll try and help you through this.

1) Some of the stones fell off the drill bit, or core
barrel (how many). Why would any fall off drilling
through kimberlite which is about as hard as mud.

2) The maximum amount of diamonds that would fall off
drilling through mud would be zero, but let's say
ten fell off leaving us 142 diamonds. That fits my
meaning of relevance, how about yours.

3) Perhaps you are saying that no diamonds were really
found and someone was dropping them into the hole from
above, or perhaps into the core boxes. This hole was
drilled pre-JV I recall.

4) Why don't you ask the one remaining director (DS) who
was there during the drill where these diamonds are now.

I'm trying to keep this in focus for you. Stick to the
subject matter and answer the questions that are put to you.

over and out - aj
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News