The 'Lyin' King' Heads for a Maulin' in the Campaign Jungle
BILL Clinton sought to repair the massive damage he has inflicted on his own party, by attending a Democratic fund-raising event yesterday in New York.
But it backfired. Just three days after the report from Kenneth Starr, the independent counsel investigating presidential abuses of power, depicted Mr Clinton as a liar and reckless sexual adventurer, the President attended a Broadway performance of the Lion King, and was immediately dubbed "the Lyin' King" by critics.
The Democrats need the President's money-raising skills, but his sexual exploits and admitted deceptions have destroyed the party's chances in congressional elections in November. Having hoped only two months ago that they would win a majority in the House of Representatives and trim the Republican lead in the Senate, Democratic pollsters now predict a wipe-out.
All over America marginal constituencies are turning Republican. Nationwide, the party enjoys a seven-point lead over the Democrats, and forecasters suggest the Republicans could pick up 20 seats in the House and five in the Senate.
This would be the third defeat President Clinton has led his party to - 1994 was a Republican landslide and 1996 a more limited defeat - and would underline the devastating impact he has had on the Democrats since 1992. "This guy has cost the Democrats three elections and now he's asking them to stand up for him," said a Republican strategist, encapsulating Mr Clinton's dilemma as he seeks support to avoid impeachment.
The Republicans, meanwhile, are congratulating themselves on not overplaying their strong hand. Newt Gingrich, Speaker of the House of Representatives, and Trent Lott, Republican leader in the Senate, are not calling for Mr Clinton's resignation, and are thus avoiding accusations that they are pre-empting Congress's duty to decide the matter.
While the mainstream press, 89 per cent of whose reporters voted Democrat in the 1996 election, appears to be trying to stir up a "Clinton comeback" story, Republicans are determined not to let either the East Coast opinion formers or the White House turn the constitutional crisis into a partisan fight. Grover Norquist, a conservative activist said: "We don't have to push the ball forward. This ball is rolling downhill." Both parties agree that the constitutional crisis is rolling inexorably toward an impeachment vote in the House. Both sides, too, warn the President to stop splitting hairs, admit that he lied under oath, and leave Congress to decide whether this amounts to perjury or an impeachable offence.
During the Clinton presidency, Republicans have gained control of Congress for the first time in half a century. The President's self-inflicted wounds are equally clear at the local level, with 70 per cent of the population, in 32 of the 50 states, now governed by Republicans. It is comparable to the Tory wipe-out in council elections during the Thatcher-Major years from 1979-97.
Stuart Rothenburg, a political analyst, wrote in his newsletter recently: "We believe the President's problems tilt the playing field toward the Republicans, particularly in conservative states." He and others see the Democrats losing up to five Senate seats, which would cut them to 40 out of 100 and end their power to defeat legislation by talking about it until time runs out. This would reduce them to mere observers rather than genuine participants in the Senate.
Tom Daschle, the Democratic leader in the Senate, stands by Mr Clinton only to the extent of not condemning him in advance of congressional hearings. In private he is said to be "apoplectic" about the defeat the President is inflicting on the party.
Both parties' pollsters point to another major problem for Democrats. The Clinton scandals have so angered Republicans, particularly conservatives, that they are determined to vote against his party. Many Democrats, though, are so disgusted and demoralised that they may not bother voting at all. Republican turnout promises to be high, while Democrats stay at home. One pollster said: "You could put an armed guard round the polling booths and Republicans would come with their guns to cast a protest vote against Clinton." |