SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum
MU 344.97+5.5%Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (38467)9/16/1998 12:23:00 AM
From: Carl R.  Read Replies (2) of 53903
 
Exactly. Allow me to repeat from your post:
the bottom line is this: The WORST thing that you can do for cost is to restrict production.

So why is Korea restricting production? The Koreans did it once before, and it helped them briefly, but helped MU much more, and cost the Korean firms in the end. They should have learned, but here they go again. Why?

My explanation is that the Korean DRAM producers are out of money. They can't compete on costs. They can't buy new equipment. The ASP is below their costs. They can't get the cost below the ASP, and they can't survive with the ASP below their costs. Thus they must get the ASP above their costs, even if only short term, or they must close. Thus they are restricting production enough to get prices up enough for them to survive. But as you point out, "it isn't a long term solution". By the end of the year, other fabs will double production (and halve costs). Thus prices will begin to fall again, and the Korean DRAM makers will be dead if they haven't reduced costs as well.

I think the end is near. By the end of the year we will know who are the winners and who are the losers. My prediction is that MU wins, the Korean DRAM makers lose.

Carl
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext