SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Bearcat (BEA-C) & Stampede (STF-C)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: teevee who wrote (1484)9/16/1998 3:10:00 AM
From: grayhairs  Read Replies (1) of 2306
 
Hi teevee,

Just for clarity, Esso's Quirk Creek gas plant is a "sour" gas plant and not a "sweet" processing facility as was suggested previously.

Quirk Creek sulphur design capacity of 307 tonnes/d is with an inlet design of 90 mmcf/d and compares to the Jumping Pound plant sulphur capacity design of 619 tonnes/d for an inlet design of 272.8 mmcf/d.

Although of smaller total capacity, the nearby Quirk Creek plant "process" can handle gas with 1.5 times the H2S content as that which can be processed at the Jumping Pound plant. So, if Jumping Pound can process the 7-25 and Hartell gas, then there's no need to go there with it !! (Unless productivity exceeds the excess capacity of the Quirk Creek gas plant of course. I'm sure McLeod would love to have that problem because a split stream to both plants sure wouldn't be economically prohibitive.)

Later,
grayhairs
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News