Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 163.33

-1.0%

Nov 25 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jon Koplik who wrote (15050)	9/16/1998 9:33:00 AM
From: Jeff Vayda	Read Replies (2) of 152472

Jon: Is this just sour grapes? IMO, the narrow base of contracts Ciena relied on is what may have produced the level of shorts in the first place. My hat is off to anyone who looked into the situation enough to be able to see that. It seems there were a number of people who saw that as a flaw. Not to rub salt into anyones wounds but it also seems some people fell in love with the company and missed that. I confess I dont follow Ciena and that is just an observation from very limited exposure to article/reports I have happened across. I would hope that this thread has had enough banter not to become a Q cult and suffer a similar denial or oversight. Jeff Vayda

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next