Racom Systems (RCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Racom Systems (RCOM)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: gammaray who wrote (314)	9/16/1998 9:57:00 AM
From: Gutterball	Read Replies (2) of 468

I do not agree Rancis was "hyping" RCOM. Several threads have ask for more information from Racom and that was his attempt to give it to them. It was a good first try but he could have said more, like their thrust to form new alliances. I agree, a reverse split is still an option therefore I don't have any illusions about Racom. With that said, the human resource is the component that will deliver brighter days to Racom and you can not convince me that Hinds and Bertman don't know anyone who would not make an excellent partner. In fact, if you watch the news on smartcards, you will get an idea who they have been talking to. As for share price, why are you acting like a Ramtron share holder? Shame on you for not listening to Hiram, believing your own charts or doubting my wisdom. Could you be more like 0\|0 than you would have us believe? Are you still holding? Is that why you channel anger at yourself onto the venerable NightOwl? If you want to play the share price game, I am of the opinion that RMTR price has a greater probability of falling 50% than does RCOM. Being an old chartist you know all about standardizing and all that.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next