Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM)

MDMN 0.000001000

-99.0%

Jun 3 1:07 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jack who wrote (6174)	9/16/1998 12:14:00 PM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (2) of 25548

This one is smoke and mirrors................................. FACT - Dayton has stated in published information that it owns all lands contained within its published boundaries and mine plan. Not according to this statement. The fact that there are outstanding lawsuits regarding the ownership of certain of these properties shows that Dayton does not own all lands contained within its published boundaries and mine plan. The fact of the lawsuits on the disputed Marilola, Encarnacion and Marijen (the Churumata claims) has been fully disclosed by Medinah in news releases. Other claims mentioned in paragraph 7 of the complaint include the properties, Mercedes, Toro, Rodrigo, and Gabriella, all of which appear to be included in Dayton's published boundaries and mine plan. There are no lawsuits or disputes on these properties. Specifically ...The fact that there are outstanding lawsuits regarding the ownership of certain of these properties shows that Dayton does not own all lands contained within its published boundaries and mine plan. Gads I hope MDIN lawyers are smarter than this statement!! This is absolute jibberish !! the Chief

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next