SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : India Coffee House
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Satish C. Shah who wrote (2750)9/16/1998 12:22:00 PM
From: JPR  Read Replies (1) of 12475
 
Satish:

I am glad that Wallace was able to confirm that they are indeed nuclear explosions and not some earth quakes / quacks falsely claimed as nuclear detonation. We should congratulate him on that opinion. Does it really mean all that much, if the power packed in these weapons matches with the claims? It is disproportionately lethal for their size.

This is quite clearly a case where governments tested for a political reason rather than scientific reasons, so we have to be suspicious of what they say," said Terry Wallace of the University of Arizona, an expert on the use of seismology to analyze nuclear explosions.

I see a flaw in his argument. Now he is not using seismological data to base his opinion, but he used his emotion and suspicion to say that "we have to suspicious". His opinion is based not seismology but on suspicion. He should take up suspectology and give up seismology.
JPR
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News