SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jlallen who wrote (3182)9/16/1998 1:32:00 PM
From: dougjn  Read Replies (2) of 67261
 
He couldn't appeal at least until she ruled. Which she put off. Because she "knew" her sealing would do the trick. The Clinton haters behind the Paula Jones case certainly wouldn't leak that testimony in violation of a Federal Court order, would they?

That leaking, as well as Starr's, is far worse than Clinton's most minor, and forgivable of all possible perjuries, to my mind. Clinton's perjury was on a very collateral subject at the very most, even if finally it was ruled to have been (barely) material. Those leaks obviously and directly affecting of outcome for the President, and directly violated the very core purpose of the Federal Court order.

Why do we not hear the press pursue this point? Because it is directly contrary to the interests of the media, pure and simple. It is a form of corruption for them not to be playing this big.

Doug
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News