Roger's 1998 Short Picks Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Roger's 1998 Short Picks

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: craig crawford who wrote (13784)	9/16/1998 3:44:00 PM
From: Gotham Guru	Read Replies (2) of 18691

<< Writing naked puts is a stupid foolish thing to do. Just when you get comfortable and think you have a good strategy of collecting your premium like a paycheck each month, the market crashes in a mass panic and every gain you have worked for years to achieve is wiped out in a single day. Stable companies like PG dropped 8 points in 15 minutes back in 1987.>> CC, my point is that some of us do not mind having stock put to us even if it happens to faall below the strike price. Some people have long term portfolios that do not have the same risks as trading portfolios and put stock under their pillow and check it it 10-20 years from now for retirement. As for 1989, if you didn't have a margin problem and you didnt sell your portfolio holdings whether you bought the stocks outrite or had them put to you, your portfolio would be fine now-unfortunately short term thinkers panic and sell some good long term holding. If I think ORCL may be a good long term buy at $20 and today is at 26 why not write naket puts at around 20? If the stock gets down to 17 and I own it at 20 now i dont mind. This is not a trading strategy but a longer tern strategy. JMO Instigator

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next