SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dougjn who wrote (3209)9/16/1998 4:50:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) of 67261
 
The rules are clear. He could have objected to the questions and terminated the deposition until the Court ruled on a motion to exclude them. If the ruling goes against him, he appeals. If the Judge seals the testimony and his counsel accepts it, then either his counsel made a mistake or he probably did not realize his client was going to lie. Nevertheless, the point is still valid. Clinton CHOSE TO LIE. No one forced it on him. IMO, his testimony is relevant to a pattern of behavior which goes to his credibility in denying such behavior.

I could care less if Clinton forced himself on Jones. I object to and detest perjurers and especially lawyers who are perjurers and allow false evidence which they have solicited into evidence.

As for Loral, a thread which I mostly lurk, I was responding to an unwarranted partisan lefty barrage. Thanks for reminding me who you are. I see your favoite color shirt is still BROWN.

JLA
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News