Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: dougjn who wrote (3298)	9/16/1998 10:32:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) of 67261

No, actually you've got it wrong. Nixon was not involved with the breakin at all. He was fully involved with the coverup. As such, his crimes were clearly impeachable, we all agree. My question to Mr. Hypothetical was if Nixon came forward after the break-in crime was evident and before his coverup, would he have been impeached? The answer of course is "No." Similarly, had Clinton admitted his affair before he perjured himself and undertook an illegal coverup, he would be in no danger of impeachment. So you see, it's really not about sex. (Even though Starr's report might lead you to think it is.)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next