<..Perhaps if you had listened to my repeated message 20 points back, you would now find them substantial and interesting...>
I think we all realize that any efforts to clue you in are studies in frustration.
For you to pop in here several months back, feeling the need to bestow upon us your revelatory insight that WCII is a telecom company building an infrastructure with significant debt financing that won't begin to book positive cashflows or earnings for 18 and 30 months (respectively), establishes your naivete.
For you to continue to appear here doing so months later (though disappearing during the time WCII rose ~25%) as though you have any insight into WCII, the sector or market, establishes your fatuity.
That you continue to do so in spite of ample clarifications concerning the appropriate metrics used to monitor the progress of such companies, as well as clarifications of how WCII continues to meet and exceed these metrics, establishes your entrenched density.
I realize that you are quite young, and in being such believe yourself to know quite a bit about the markets. I think most here clearly see the enormous gap between your puerile ego and your desiderate level of sophistication.
BTW, had you called the market correction, knowing you we would still have considered you merely lucky, but at least you'd have established a basis for future consideration here. Fact is, you were near term wrong in WCII's price performance, and understandably disappeared during that time. That the market corrected, and as a result you think your unidimensional and trivial assessment of WCII was somehow prescient, establishes the amusing severity of your delusions.
I recommend you teethe and troll for attention elsewhere. |