SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 265.39+4.2%Dec 2 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (24363)9/17/1998 7:59:00 AM
From: Tejman  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
JS,
Its strange or just a coincidence, but I have been thinking on the same lines(since the EPS of Intel is rounded upwards). Unfortunately back in 96 I had Intel shares but it kept going down till it bottomed at $50. It started slowly during the summer of 96. Then around end Nov it reached $87 when Kurklac was still very negative on Semi's, I therefore panicked & sold it (My biggest mistake as it went to $150 pre/split only 10/11 months later). After having sold Intel I followed AMAT very carefully it was still at $25/26 around Jan 97. It started slowly around March it was $36 when I got in, but thereafter it started real upwards.

The point is when Companies like Intel say the demand is increasing, there is was lag of about 3 months before AMAT stabalized on a price level and a lag of 7/8 months before it lifts off from this platform. The demand in equipment lags by few months the demand of Semi's.

This was the history of 96, I personally don't tend to draw any conclusions from it as Intels demand can be temporary and the whole situation is different & 7/8 months is a long time.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext