Mr. Mitchell,
So you are now admitting there was NO JUDGEMENT, and that your diligence was very poor before you made your fabricated claims;
"........As for WellRich, I've learned a lot about arbitration in the past few
weeks or so. I gather from talking to you that you think it's totally
worthless without the full backing of a court. I think the AAA and other
similar organizations would beg to differ, but that's an argument better
left for people with legal backgrounds and piles of statistics and
surveys to debate......"
One can easily confirm the existence of a "judgement". You couldn't do so, because the contention was FABRICATED. Mr. Jihad even admitted so for the record. Also, in the same vein, YOU CANNOT PROVE THERE WAS A CONTRACT WITH WELLRICH AFTER MR. SHURR LEFT IN 5/97!! Did you notice Mr. Jihad evaded those questions also??
Your post is pathetic Mr. Mitchell, you now admit, like Mr. Jihad, that the contentions were FABRICATED. I believe you better inform Ms. Shell, she has told me as late as yesterday that she will be posting the judgement for all to see.
Can you now inform Ms. Shell of Wellrich's relationship with Mr. Marchese, and explain to her why the TA REJECTED the 144's Wellrich procured by calling AZNT shareholders to SELL! Can you tell her about the 'medallion signature' dilema?
I'm happy you finally admitted the story was fabricated AND your diligence was quite poor.
RB |
