Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hiram Walker who wrote (3354)	9/17/1998 11:41:00 AM
From: Michael Sphar	Read Replies (2) of 67261

Hiram, Your example points out a fallacy of thinking that sex is to be punished, I'm not sure why you are promulgating that. The harassment issue is one that deals with relative power. There is no inherent power imbalance between two consenting military officers of approximate same rank, hence they can socialize without fear of fraternization policy issues. The inherent harassment comes when there is a power imbalance implied by significant difference in rank, especially as in an officer and enlisted or non-commissioned person. This power imbalance is paralleled in civilian life in the extreme with the President and a White House intern.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next