SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 98.59-2.8%Nov 13 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dwight Taylor who wrote (19155)9/17/1998 12:14:00 PM
From: Shelia Jones  Read Replies (2) of 116759
 
Starr is wrong to embarass the President. If this is the road we go down as a country we are clearly in the wrong direction. This is a privacy issue and a dangerous precedent.

Uh, Dwight... Picture this:

Your boss has his croneys escort you to his office unexpectedly one day. Alone in his office with you he drops his drawers and expects ???? You leave. (You know, kind of like Paula Jones ... Which is how this investigation started.)

You decide to sue for sexual harrassment - it's your perogative.

During the investigation it is discovered that your boss has a history of such conduct so you try to bring this to light. Not only that but your fellow employee (say his name is Myron Lewinski), gets a $90,0000 a year job offer at Revlon because your bosses' main croney, (lets call him Vernon Jordan) calls the CEO (admitted under oath by V.J.) and askes that Myron be offered this position to keep him from talking in your trial.

Under oath your boss lies that he has ever exhibited this behavior before and sends out his henchmen to discredit you and calls you white trash ect.

So I guess you think this is a privacy issue...
Starr can not embarrass the POTUS. The POTUS can only embarrass himself.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext