Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: The Philosopher who wrote (3503)	9/18/1998 1:18:00 AM
From: jim kelley	Read Replies (4) of 67261

Wow, you are misleading people! An oral contract is not worth the paper it is not wriiten on. Courts will accept paper over oral agreements 98% of the time unless there are credible witnesses to override the written contract. This encourages sales people to lie freely to the customers. They then overcome the burden of their lies by the fine print in their contracts. Thus the parole evidence is over ridden by contracts and in many cases is not accepted at all if there is no written contract. This legal principle encourages lying. Also, I notice you did not deal with the "caveat emptor" issue. This legal principle also encourages lying. If you went to law school, you are either in denial or you have no real world experience.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next