>So you are willing to back off someone after you or your surrogates have kicked the shit out of them and they lie bleeding helplessly on the floor begging for mercy. The quality of mercy is strained....
Statutory rape is OK?<
Absolutely not. My point had nothing to do with the law, but rather was an attempt to understand why Hyde would try and protect against the further bludgeoning and public humiliation of someone who had already flatly admitted to having broken the law. Sure the lawbreaker should have suffered, or at least undergone the mechanics of our legal system. It is my understanding that Crane, in effect, had thrown himself upon the mercy of the "court" and that the "court" had forgiven him. If so, then Crane filtered through the mechanics of the law.
I have always said. Had Clinton done the same-- repented, throwing himself upon the mercy of our system, I would have been free to ignore his errors and to focus exclusively upon the rejection of his politics. He has not done this, but has repeatedly lied, schemed, and continues to lie, insulting the intelligence of the entire world.
So I am as consistent as I have ever been, and you sir, are revealed to be one who does not even attempt to reason. You merely desire to grind your foolish liberal axe, hopping in the sack with so many non-thinking, mouth-foaming Clintonoid E-whoric lunatics. Have at least some self-respect and reject the mantras taught you by the White House. Try and understand the arguements of others. |
