In some ways, that binary Shark formula is needlessly complicated.
For example, this:
Shark:=If((H<Ref(H,-1) AND L>Ref(L,-1) AND Ref(H,-1)<Ref(H,-2) AND Ref(L,-1)>Ref(L,-2))=1,
If(apex <= (Ref(H,-2)-(WB*Symmetry)) AND Apex >= (Ref(L,-2)+(WB*Symmetry)) ,1,0),0);
is the same as this (which doesn't have the "=1" in the first data array:
Shark:=If((H<Ref(H,-1) AND L>Ref(L,-1) AND Ref(H,-1)<Ref(H,-2) AND Ref(L,-1)>Ref(L,-2)),
If(apex <= (Ref(H,-2)-(WB*Symmetry)) AND Apex >= (Ref(L,-2)+(WB*Symmetry)) ,1,0),0);
Here it is again, with the "=1" in bold italics, so you can find it easily, and see what the heck I'm talking about:
Shark:=If((H<Ref(H,-1) AND L>Ref(L,-1) AND Ref(H,-1)<Ref(H,-2) AND Ref(L,-1)>Ref(L,-2)) =1 ,
If(apex <= (Ref(H,-2)-(WB*Symmetry)) AND Apex >= (Ref(L,-2)+(WB*Symmetry)) ,1,0),0);
The "=1" is redundant, because in Metastock, Boolean statements are already assigned 1 if they're true.
Am I wrong? They appear to plot the same, with or without the "=1."
Brooke |
