SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Future growth stocks of 1997

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: White Shoes who wrote (252)12/21/1996 9:01:00 PM
From: Paul Schmidt   of 391
 
I agree except for the EPS part. Many hot small company stocks take a while for their earnings to catch up. As long as the revenue is increasing by 50% a year then I don't care so much about EPS. Keep in mind that when the hot stocks split like there is no tomorrow that EPS gets smaller until they cool off for a while. FORE and IOM are good examples. Hell, IOM still hasn't had a quarter over .12 in EPS. High PE is justifyable in those cases. There should maybe be a small minimum for the EPS growth rate but I think revenue growth should be the biggest emphasis.

One modification that I wish Dan would consider is setting the minimum per share price to $10 or at least $5 to weed out the penny stocks and pure speculation plays.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext