SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 473.99+0.4%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gerald Walls who wrote (10862)9/21/1998 3:37:00 AM
From: ed  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
I think you miss the point here. The love story between the president and his lover
is a private matter , and should be resolved between the president and his family privately.
Mr. Ken Starr should not involved in this investigation in the first place. By investigating , and put all the private matters into the public domain, he had violated the basic rule , that is everyone has the right to keep his privacy as long as it is not a criminal act,( this case is quite different than the case of Watergate) which include the president. We all know that President did not commit a crime by having love story
with a woman besides his wife, the worst we can say about the president is that he is not loyal to his wife, which had nothing to do whether he is a good president or a bad one. Say ,you have a relation with another woman, should the medias investigate it and put all the stories into the public? Or should your friends investigate it and write a story about it on the newspaper ? Or should the court investigate it and announce that by having a relation with another woman you have committed a crime ? Or should you resolve this family issue privately between you and your wife ?
Anyway, the law did not say have a relation with another woman besides your wife is a crime, especially , both sides did it on a voluntary base !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What is most ironical is that the man who was assigned to judge this case is a man who had a love story with a married women 30 years ago, and what was worst is
that this man told his lover that he was not married at that time, and actually he was,
as a result a family was destroyed. What a double standard conducted by this congress !!!!!!!!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext