byg Message Board - Msg: 5803498

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : byg

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Al Cern who wrote (729)	9/21/1998 2:58:00 PM
From: stockman	Read Replies (1) of 769

Hi Al From what I have hear/rumour they have shorn up all the requirements with the tailings dam. Meaning that the dyke has been strengthen and raised and they will be able to handle any further run offs. They have also been able to treat the effluent discharge to meet environmental standards. We shouldn't see a problem in this area again. I hope. I was also told that they should have never shut down. They could have treated the discharge by running it through the mill to reduce its' toxicicity. Because they shut down they were forced to incur all the costs with start up. The BOD decided to shut the operation down because they would have been on the hook if anything happened. They decided to take a better safe than sorry attitude. The reconstruction of the tailings dam has drained their working capital and they have insufficient funds to continue operating. Part 2 tomorrow

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next