Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (4317)	9/21/1998 5:21:00 PM
From: dougjn	Read Replies (2) of 67261

Actually, Clinton used two definitions of "sexual relations". The one he mostly discussed was the exact wording in the Jones suit. That definition not only didn't include intercourse. It also didn't include oral sex if the one speaking (the deponent) was only on the receiving end. Remarkably enough, that IS a permissible, and even likely, reading of the words in that definition, after the Judge had chopped out the second and third parts of it. The second was the one he suggested Monica Lewinsky might have been using. That's the one that must include sexual intercourse, he said. Apparently that is what some dictionaries say. Even if it sure isn't what our Hollywood and drugstore novels say, etc. The real point is that Clinton made clear he was NOT trying to let the Jones lawyers know everything that was going on. He was trying to keep as much hidden as he possibly could -- and still avoid perjury. So anyone who says that is not what people commonly mean is entirely missing the point. That is not the controlling legal standard. And Clinton was NOT trying to help the Jones lawyers. Who were principally trying to dragnet dirt and leak it to the press, to damage him politically. Doug

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next