SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dougjn who wrote (4352)9/21/1998 6:22:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) of 67261
 
>>Perhaps the reason they didn't is that direct a question would have tipped Clinton off that they had some real proof of what had actually happened,....<<

Or perhaps it is something so simple as interpreting the definition of "sexual relations" to include the president's penis within the "genitalia" part of the definition, and since his penis was definitely in "relation" to Monica's mouth, he perjured himself.

But in the Starr Report it says "even putting aside his definitional defense, the President made a second false statement to the grand jury. The President's grand jury testimony contradicts Ms. Lewisnsky's grand jury testimony on the question whether the President touched Ms. Lewinsky's breasts of genitalia during their sexual activity. There can be no contention that one of them has a lack of memory or is mistaken. On this issue, either Monica Lewinsky lied to the grand jury, or President Clinton lied to the grand jury. Under any rational view of the evidence, the President lied to the grand jury." And then it goes on to detail Lewinksy's detailed and specific testimony about these encounters. But of course, it does take a rational view to understand this. bp
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext