SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 471.27-0.6%11:17 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gerald Walls who wrote (10886)9/22/1998 3:12:00 AM
From: Bearded One  Read Replies (3) of 74651
 
Hate to break it to you, but

1) Lying does not constitue perjury. It has to be material, as in relevant.

2) A consensual secret sexual affair between Clinton and Lewinsky was not material to an alleged non-consensual sexual harrassment of Jones by Clinton.

Yes, this may be a technical legalistic answer, but so what? It's a technical legalistic accusation as well. Sex lies in court occur hundreds of thousands of times a year and never get prosecuted. Why? Because it's stupid. People inherently realize that people will lie about sex. To use the legal system to prosecute a sex lie is oppressive and more applicable to Iran's legal system than ours, whatever the law happens to be.

I personally have witness two cases of clear perjury, one of which was provable beyond a reasonable doubt. Both of them were lies that went to the heart of the cases. Guess how many of them got prosecuted?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext