Dear Mr Ike, thank you for devoting the total expanse of the last post to me. I know I got your attention. Again, since this is the second post you posted to me, you defaulted on your solumn promise for the second time that you would never post me again. Talking about credibility here. Gosh, I just know you can't stand it when your so-called sanity and judgement and composure is weighted against your ever-expanding ego. God I pushed the right button.
Second, despite the length of the last post, you still haven't answered my question yet which I have asked you for the third time:
Before you recommend people to go long on ALA at around 18, what are you going to tell those people what to do with those ALA shares they bought at high 30's and 40's when you pounded the table on the stock (and many others)? People are hurting, you know. At least you could say something to the effect that "I did not have a sexual relationship with Ms Leuwensky" or something?
No, Ike, you are wrong. I don't want to destroy you. As I said, I admire you and your efforts (I am being very consistent on that). See, the Republicans would fare better if they leave BC in office until the election. See how it works, Ike?
Now, anwser my question, please:
Before you recommend people to go long on ALA at around 18, what are you going to
tell those people what to do with those ALA shares they bought at high 30's and 40's
when you pounded the table on the stock (and many others)? |
