Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??

PRST 0.0001000

0.0%

Sep 29 10:16 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: GVTucker who wrote (9974)	9/22/1998 10:09:00 AM
From: SG	Read Replies (1) of 11098

GV, thanks for the post of info from Heidelberg. It was a good read. As for my post regarding the royalty of PRST, it was in response to a request by others of Jim Shircliff and I to trade places and try and support the other side for once. How convenient that you only post my fictitious bearish position without the benefit of Jim Shirc's bullish stand. At least you can be some what objective in keeping the real issue at hand. That is that we are talking about PRST and not each other as Steve seems addicted to. I stand behind my belief that PRST must maintain control of the "DI" technology. The article did not say that Heidelberg was not paying nor would it. It would also not say it was, just as it does not talk about the on going licensing of technology in the QM-DI+. Heidelberg would not use that forum to stand up and shout, one way or another the issue of royalties and or license. It did use on several occations the term Direct Imaging. Heidelberg is clearly in favor of this great technology and will continue with its development. Further more, many others will use Heidelberg as an ice breaker to clear the way ahead. "DI" is here to stay and so is the no-process plates that are required to use such technology. No crushing blow yet. Time is clearly running out. My opinion only SG

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next