Bearcat (BEA-C) & Stampede (STF-C) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Bearcat (BEA-C) & Stampede (STF-C)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: grayhairs who wrote (1554)	9/22/1998 12:40:00 PM
From: teevee	Read Replies (1) of 2306

Hi, There has not been enough seismic shot to "definitively" show closure, however, an experienced foothills geophysicist can infer closure from a combination of drill picks from existing wells and available seismic data. As good as the advances have been in seismic acquisition and processing, seismic in the disturbed belt remains "problematic". This does make it more difficult to pick the optimum location to test a structure, and increases risk accordingly. Another type of closure in this area are north-east trending faults which "compartmentalize" reservoirs. If the 7-25 well is a success, it will show that Hartel was not an isolated discovery on a relatively small structure and demonstrate that Devonian structures in the Turner Valley area are definately prospective for major gas and gas liquids discoveries. Hopefully,we will then soon see the Turner Valley area become a district size play for the majors. Shell and IOL et al have already demonstrated that the second slice of the Mississippian is prospective for oil and gas in this area. I look forward to the results of the 7-25 well.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next