Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (4729)	9/22/1998 4:34:00 PM
From: mrknowitall	Read Replies (1) of 67261

<<OT>> Michelle, what about the 50 year-olds who buy houses? Is the law specific to the age of the buyer and seller? I don't think so. In fact, I really think that if a 95 year-old wanted to buy a house there, the taxes would be higher for that 95 year old as well. As for "There are fewer and fewer houses on the market as a result of this law." I assume that the apparent effect of existing homeowners not moving is the rationale you would use for that. I must say there is a strong likelihood of causality. I would submit, however, that the economic opportunity for people who do move and take advantage of the newer tax treatment on homestead sales should have a mitigating effect, as you have indicated "they should" in an earlier post. I'm still trying to determine why that leads you to believe you have a right to ask them to leave if they don't want to? By the way, we'll all be older someday. The idea is to be rich enough not to worry so much about taxes, isn't it? Mr. K.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next