SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 492.01+1.3%Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (10934)9/23/1998 2:33:00 AM
From: Gerald Walls  Read Replies (3) of 74651
 
<OT> Large quotes of worthless editorials? As opposed to your personal pompous moralizing, in the grand Christian Nation/Moral Majority style?

No, as opposed to my quotes of facts from the official Starr report to debunk your arguments based on feelings and emotions. I'm saying that if, as it overwhelmingly appears, Clinton committed a felony such as perjury then he should be prosecuted (meaning impeachment in his position) and counter your arguments with relevant quotes from documents such as a letter from four AGs and the Starr report. You're saying it isn't fair, they're out to get him, and he's suffered enough and back up your argument with quotes from editorialists that feel the same way.

You're still doing only three things:

1) saying that Clinton should get off because everybody does it,
2) attacking Starr, and
3) attacking me.

You're no longer saying Clinton didn't commit a felony. You're just looking for any way to excuse it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext