Drano, I like the tone of capitulation, so I will answer your question with minimal sarcasm, which is quite difficult given the subject and who I am speaking to. BTW, quit yelling in all caps. You are like some poor boy crying wolf all the time. No one listens and you sound like some whiner rather than the bull(y) you think you come off as. These chat board room debates are won by brains not unbridled brawn.
Your question is, in fact, answered by Dynacam. They have a refined and deliverable product and guess what? The world of finance has not beaten a track to their door. In fact, TRAV et al would seemingly rather they not exist as Dynacam shows an available product that works and has a large part of the engineering kinks worked out of it. AENG is just some OTC BB being bulled by some Denver penny stockbroker.
Without Dynacam as a comparable, there are many negatives which have been outlined many times: No US Patents, No financials, Reg. 504, Very Questionable Dominant Market Maker who defends the stock price using questionable methods which have recently been shown to be illegal by the NASD and are under trial at the SEC as I write this. Massive insider selling. No research, no filings other than a handwritten form 504. Just because some guy has a mock up running does not mean a company with no patent protection, no cash, no staff and no resources should be worth $200 M. In fact, quite the opposite. I guess you could ask, what is it that AENG has going for it beyond a distant hope, wish and a prayer?
All of the above in my opinion, but the evidence is daunting. |
