Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: dougjn who wrote (5007)	9/23/1998 2:40:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (4) of 67261

I think in light of the Lewinsky revelations, they (the press) owe Paula Jones an apology. In spite of what you say, (and I'm not going to go over this ground again, it's been thoroughly documented) the Jones case went through every single hurdle to present evidence of sexual harassment and the case was only dismissed because according to Judge Wright, there was insufficient evidence to prove "damages" even if the behavior took place (as described by Jones about the President). Now, the June Supreme Court ruling in the Burlington case highly increases the potential for the case to be re-instated. I notice you do not address the fact that Bill Clinton could still be cited for contempt in that proceeding or even a summary judgement issued in favor of Paula Jones. So all your opining about the validity or the motivatins of the litigants in the case seems somewhat irrelevant to the final disposition of the case. bp

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next