Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (6800)	9/23/1998 4:29:00 PM
From: Liatris Spicata	Read Replies (1) of 13994

Borzou- A Patently Idiotic Statement- <<I merely get annoyed by the hypocrisy of those who claim to want to protect our children from smut and then ruthlessly disseminate it when it suits their political ends.>> You fail to draw the most elemental of distinctions- which is the hallmark of a critical mind. Starr's purpose, unlike the pornographer, was not to entertain people- it was to document what he learned during the course of his investigation of a man whose life could very well be the subject of a low-grade porno flick. If his clinical prose strikes some as erotic- well that says more about them than about Starr or his report. But Starr believed he had to report what he did to substantiate the charge of perjury that he made against Clinton. Could his serious charges of perjury have been made without the accompanying evidence?? Starr's report is no more pornographic than an academic study of human sexuality such as those conducted by Masters and Johnson. I would expect that you could make basic distinctions. Larry P.S. We do agree on one thing: the government should not ban pornography, at least where it concerns only consenting adults.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next