SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dougjn who wrote (5054)9/23/1998 4:37:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (2) of 67261
 
I didn't say it involved independent evidence gathering. But quite frankly, it's the Dems in congress (Waters has been extremely vocal on this point) who have been insisting that Starr's report is "one-sided", "that the witnesses were not cross-examined," etc. I agree that the witnesses are not to be questioned by the House at the point of deciding whether the report contains sufficient evidence of impeachable offenses. My only point to you is that the House will have to thoroughly review all the materials. There's a lot of stuff to digest and I don't think the process should be hurried.

As far as releasing the documents to the public, the hearings before the House will be public, it only seems reasonable that the public should have the same information at their disposal. Please remember that there was a full House vote by a 2/3 majority (obviously included large number of Dems) that all the information should be released by Sept. 28.

bp
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News