Starr's home video - smart? stupid? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Starr's home video - smart? stupid?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Cage Rattler who wrote (3)	9/23/1998 4:50:00 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (3) of 43

Hi Ted, Sure, but he lied about sex to protect his family from disgrace and save face for himself. No State Attorney in the U.S. would proceed with filing charges on someone who did that considering the mitigating circumstances surrounding the incident. Frankly, Starr's performance was nothing more or less than an invasion of privacy motivated by political arrogance. Starr should return the $40 plus million back to the taxpayers and he's the one who should be prosecuted and incarcerated for his abuse of authority, if that's not an ironic twist of outcome. Clinton ought to file a harassment suit against Starr and his cronies for invasion of privacy and workplace harassment. Also, punitive damages are negotiable. How's that for a spin on this mess? How ya been? And so we have a horny President, so what? We could be proud of him. It could have been worse. What if he were caught with a male intern? Oh boy, I know I'm gonna get flack for this. Okay, let me have it. GZ

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next