Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: j_b who wrote (5022)	9/23/1998 7:43:00 PM
From: Johnathan C. Doe	Read Replies (1) of 67261

"harassment is very much dependent on the feelings of the person that claims they were harassed."; you obviously have a lay level on knowledge on this. I have a friend that is an HR professional. That is not the standard or you really would have a flood of cases in this area. I was against Thomas from the start for one reason and one reason alone; I didn't think he was qualified and even close to being in the top tier of choices. I actually supported Robert Bork even though he is so partisan now I can't believe I had. Am I partisan; if this was done by Dem's against Bush; I would have denounced it. Bush will go down in history as a great great President. Far better than Reagan. I didn't vote for him in '92 because I didn't like how out of touch he was with how bad the economy was. I didn't like that he could not care how much the middle and lower class where suffering and had been since the end of the '80's. He really was out of it on that subject. I also hated Dan Quayle and thought him unqualified to be a VP of the US and I was scared if something happened to Bush, Quayle didn't seem capable to run the country. I still can't stand him. I voted for Reagan in '84 and Bush in '88.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next