Jim,
Please don't misrepresent my positions.
I have yet to tout INNN here, I have no idea where you come up with the things you say. And yes the original INNN equipment might be outdated, but that isn't what we are talking about here. It is the technology that is important, and that works no matter how you deliver it. Satellite, internet, cable box, orange juice cans strung together, whatever. And of course the NTN box we see in bars is a very simplistic version of the original "outdated" INNN control unit.
If you refer back to my posts you will see that I refer to INNN as a company who owns the technology that NTN is using and whose own business is defunct except for the lawsuit against TCI claiming abuse of control, as they attempted through that control to drive INNN out of business and take the technology. Buy shares in a company like that at your own peril.
My main point is that people who come here for information should get both sides of the story. You do not provide a balanced opinion. Every bullish side of the story has a compelling negative side that you choose to ignore. Especially IWN.
Please try to work a little harder on your grammer and spelling. I hate to sound petty, but good God, I had to read your last post 3 times to figure out what you meant by Vargas.
And contrary to what you say the January effect is a long term, tried and true investing strategy. It works best with companies that have solid financials, that have been knocked down in price, and then further hurt by tax loss selling. But even a dog like NTN should get a bounce. Research will lead to the gems, but it is a widespread common occurence.
Sorry for the angry tone but touts piss me off.
Dwight |
