Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (5070)	9/24/1998 9:34:00 AM
From: j_b	Read Replies (2) of 67261

<< we're better off with the Repubs in control of congress(the purse strings) & in order to keep their radical right at bay, putting a democrat in the White House >> I agree. In California we tried the other way (Democrat Congress Republican Governor) and it doesn't work as well. Using a veto to stop a spending bill is guaranteed to gore someone's ox, and makes the person limiting the spending an easy target. The Democrats here love to spend money, and have been known to pass bills for the express purpose of having the governor veto them. That gives them the ability to say they voted for helping the children (or whatever) and that mean old Republican took the bread right out of their mouths. <<I believe there definitely should be obscenity laws of some sort for the internet. Since the internet is international, how would you enforce it? If you hold the ISP responsible, you are asking them to police the content of every single person using their service - a completely impossible task.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next