Starr's home video - smart? stupid? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Starr's home video - smart? stupid?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: yard_man who wrote (18)	9/24/1998 11:22:00 AM
From: J.B.C.	Read Replies (1) of 43

I am not sure that it was a poor decision to release the tape, the release of all the facts need to be played out yet. It was obvious from his testimony he is lying. Q: If Miss Lewinsky were to testify that you touched her breast, would she be lying? A: I defer to my previous statement. --> A well worded escape clause that doesn't meet the requirements of Grand Jury Testimony. The House cannot (should not) be swayed by public opinion on this issue. It is time for leadership which is not related to public opinion. What if FDR waited for public opinion on Dec. 7th 1941? The people who give Clinton a pass on the facts presented, to me represent an apathy that is unacceptable. This is the person elected to uphold the law, to thumb his nose at it as Clinton has done is just not forgivable. This man's whole Presidency has been about LIE's. - I did not inhale ( this is the point I new he was not credible) - I did not have a relationship with Jennifer Flowers - I did hurt my family with regard to Jennifer Flowers How can anything that this man says ( a confessed liar) be believed for the remainder of his term. There is absolutely NO reason this bozo be allowed to remain in office. Jim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next