SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should Clinton resign?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mrknowitall who wrote (537)9/24/1998 11:25:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (2) of 567
 
Oh dear. One more futile attempt. Do the voters have the right to know whether the candidates have an opinion as to whether the evidence in the public version of the Starr report is sufficient grounds for impeachment? And do the voters have the right to know what that opinion is? I have no idea what this "lack of a sense of constitutionally-defined duty" business is supposed to mean. Non incumbents can read the oath before they take it, and read the Constitution too. Or do they have to wait for Newt to explain it to them at their swearing in?

It would seem that given the massive push to get the whole lurid mess out in public as quickly as possible, you might expect the candidates to come up with some opinion one way or the other by election time, maybe? Or were Starr and Newt just trying to get all the "facts" on the table, so the candidates could ignore them? Feel free to ignore those last two question, but do we have the right to know what their current opinion is? Or should we just trust them to "do the right thing"? oops, scratch that last one too.

Cheers, Dan.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext