SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (6863)9/24/1998 12:50:00 PM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (1) of 13994
 
Well, the person I was talking to was from upper Indiana and the hotel room was in Chicago: pretty much central America.

I can't speak for all generations, but at one time the limits for "nice" girls were heavy petting that included some (still-clothed) breast fondling. That might continue to "third base" (i.e. genital fingering). But even if a woman's hymen was completely cleaned out by the foregoing activities, she was considered chaste.

With the advent of the pill in whenever it was, a lot more couples went on to complete sexual intercourse, but the emotional bonding that ensued could often result in a formal marriage without the compulsion of pregnancy.

What surprised me in my conversation yesterday was the idea that a woman's performing oral sex on a man could just be thought of as one further extension beyond heavy petting or mutual masturbation. I may be giving something away about myself when I say that I thought of it as something beyond rather than on this side of complete genital sexual intercourse. I do know that at least some women of Clinton's generation thought of it that way; I remember one woman's saying, "I wouldn't do that except for someone I REALLY loved."

But it does seem that for some persons everything short of penetration and ejaculation within the woman's vagina represents different levels of foreplay that start with, say, a pat on the shoulder.

I do think that for me and for most people, the placing of the penis in the mouth is a sexual act and that Clinton is, to say the least, disingenuous in implying otherwise.

One thing that truly alarms me is the idea that calling someone "sweetie" is a compromising action.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News