Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill who wrote (5167)	9/24/1998 2:22:00 PM
From: dougjn	Read Replies (1) of 67261

I thought at the time that Articles of Impeachment were voted by the House that some of the Articles did not rise to an impeachable level. But since several clearly did, what difference did it make? I'm thinking of what I believe (but am not sure) was the first count, lying to the American people. I thought by itself that that was ridiculous. (And could be used as a pretext to impeach just about anybody.) Noting Starr's often quoted remarks about purging pornography perverts has nothing to do with political gotcha, to my mind. It's not just a political campaign exaggeration, or a youthful over statement. It seems to represent how the man now thinks and feels. (Although I wouldn't of course take purge to have its Stalinist meaning -- Starr would probably accept less than death or life imprisonment in Siberia. Well, at least a little less. I think. <gg>) Doug Doug

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next