SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.
AAPL 272.98-0.1%12:32 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zen Dollar Round who wrote (18446)9/24/1998 2:58:00 PM
From: Alomex  Read Replies (1) of 213177
 

If that's true, Microsoft got a great deal. :)

Are you sure? Do you know what is the amount of money exchanged between two large corporations when signing a large cross-licensing patent arrangement? What is the usual percentage paid if a single patent is licensed?

My figures are now somewhat out of date, but for example, most of Snow White and the Seven dwarfs had cross-patent licensing arrangments with no money involved (anybody here old enough to name the seven dwarfs?).

The usual percentage paid for patent licensing is 1% of price. So $300million presumes sales of $30 billion in violating products....

So if anything $300mill sounds too high. Now, when you are trying to save your megacorporation from being broken into pieces by the DoJ, I wouldn't be surprised if M$ paid as much as $1bill in fifty easy installments....

The exception to the above rule is when patent violation infringes over a main stay product, such as M$ violation of stacker, which was completely unintentional (meaning they were unaware that the technology was patented, the copying was, of course, on purpose).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext